Blockchain

What Is Blockchain Scalability?

Beginner

2025-12-10 | 10m

Public blockchains enable secure and transparent transactions without relying on a single controlling authority, serving as an alternative to traditional centralized ledger systems. Their security is based on robust cryptographic methods and a decentralized network structure, which prevent data tampering and censorship. Despite these advantages, blockchains still face significant challenges in scalability and performance, limiting their ability to efficiently handle large volumes of transactions. Compared to traditional Web 2.0 systems, their limited transaction throughput and slower processing speeds hinder the widespread adoption of this technology in high-demand applications.

The good news is that the Web3 industry is actively working to address these limitations. While the scalability of even the best blockchains remains far below that of the fastest Web 2.0 systems, numerous solutions have been introduced in recent years to bridge this gap.

In this article, we will discuss the concept of blockchain scalability, explain its underlying issues, and outline the main technologies for improving blockchains while maintaining network integrity.

Key Takeaways

Public blockchain scalability refers to a network's ability to handle a growing number of transactions without compromising speed, cost, security, or decentralization.
Key methods for improving scalability include Layer 1 consensus upgrades, parallel processing via sharding, Layer 2 solutions such as sidechains and rollups, interoperable chain ecosystems, and modular blockchain architectures.
Solutions encompass Layer 1 improvements like Proof of Stake (PoS), sharding, and SegWit to enhance base chain performance. Layer 2 solutions include sidechains and rollups (Optimistic and Zero-Knowledge) for offloading transactions.

What Is Blockchain Scalability?

A public blockchain is a decentralized digital ledger that securely and transparently records transactions without relying on central authority. When Bitcoin (BTC) launched in 2009, it marked the arrival of the first viable decentralized network secured by cryptography, enabling peer-to-peer digital currency transfers. While Bitcoin's decentralized model was a revolutionary concept, it soon became clear that its scalability was limited, with the blockchain capable of processing only about 7 transactions per second (TPS), compared to traditional enterprise-grade Web 2.0 systems.

In this context, blockchain scalability refers to a network's ability to increase its transaction throughput while maintaining speed and security. TPS is a key metric used to measure this capacity, indicating how many transactions the entire network can process per second. A higher TPS allows a blockchain to support more users and applications without creating bottlenecks or excessive costs.

The challenge of achieving scalability on a blockchain is related to the so-called blockchain trilemma. This concept highlights the difficulty of optimizing the three core attributes of a blockchain: decentralization, security, and scalability. Improving one or two often requires trade-offs that reduce the third. For example, increasing TPS through centralized control may compromise decentralization and security.

Recent Blockchain Developments

Following Bitcoin, newer blockchains like Ethereum (ETH), launched in 2015, have worked to improve performance by supporting more complex applications and smart contracts, but their scalability remains limited compared to leading Web 2.0 systems.

More recent blockchain networks have made significant progress in performance. Solana (SOL), which launched in 2020, is often considered the most scalable among popular public blockchains, claiming to support up to 65,000 TPS under ideal conditions. Despite this representing a major improvement, especially compared to Bitcoin's anemic 7 TPS, Solana and similar platforms still lag far behind robust Web 2.0 computing infrastructure. In contrast, major cloud service providers like Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google Cloud can process millions of transactions or requests per second by distributing workloads across vast data centers.

While blockchains do offer unique advantages through decentralization and security, their scalability remains a major bottleneck compared to traditional systems.

Why Is Scalability Important in Blockchain?

Scalability in public blockchains is crucial because slow transaction speeds and limited capacity create bottlenecks that hinder the widespread adoption of the technology. When a blockchain processes transactions too slowly, the user experience suffers, making it difficult for applications to gain traction. This issue is particularly evident in areas like decentralized finance (DeFi) and gaming, where speed and responsiveness are critical.

DeFi platforms rely on fast transaction confirmations to execute trades, lending, and other financial operations. Slow processing can create delays between a user's request and its actual execution and may expose users to risks like price slippage or failed transactions. These issues can lead to frustration, loss of funds, and missed opportunities, all of which hinder users from relying on blockchain-based financial services.

Similarly, blockchain-based games require fast, seamless interactions to keep players engaged. Games that experience lag or delayed responses tend to lose users quickly, as the experience falls below the real-time expectations set by traditional gaming platforms. Without improved scalability, blockchain gaming will always struggle to compete with Web 2.0 gaming.

Beyond consumer-facing applications, insufficient scalability also limits blockchain adoption in the enterprise sector. Many businesses require systems capable of processing high volumes of transactions in real-time while maintaining security and transparency. Blockchain's limited throughput and higher latency often frustrates business users. Consequently, many companies are reluctant to implement blockchain solutions at scale, as current blockchain networks cannot match the speed and capacity of existing centralized infrastructure.

In short, improving blockchain scalability is essential to unlocking technology's full potential in finance, gaming, social, enterprise, and numerous other fields. It is clear that without significant scalability improvements, blockchain will continue to face barriers to mainstream acceptance, remaining a niche technology favored only by a limited part of the market—its avid enthusiasts.

Public Blockchain Scalability Issues

Scalability issues in blockchain systems manifest in several specific and recurring ways: limited transaction throughput, longer confirmation times, and high fees during congestion. These problems affect both users and developers, creating friction that prevents blockchain technology from being widely used in everyday applications.

Network Transaction Speed and Capacity

Most first-generation blockchains, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, adopt a structure where all nodes on the network must process and validate every transaction. This architecture preserves decentralization and security but limits the number of transactions that can be confirmed within a given time interval. When demand exceeds network capacity, transactions begin to queue, and users are forced to wait or compete to have their transactions processed first.

Aggressive Transaction Fees

This competition directly leads to the second problem: high fees. Blockchains typically use a fee market mechanism that prioritizes users willing to pay more. During high-traffic periods, fees can spike dramatically, making simple operations costly and often unaffordable for smaller users. This dynamic makes some blockchain applications expensive to use, particularly on DeFi platforms, where multiple transactions are often required to complete a single operation.

Today, the most obvious manifestation of this problem is likely the high fees on Ethereum, which can surge into double-digit USD figures during periods of high network demand. Although typical Ethereum transaction fees had fallen below $1 by mid-2025, some complex transactions in DeFi and NFT minting could still cost over $95 during network congestion.

Long Confirmation Times

The third major issue is longer confirmation times, which occur when the network is congested and transactions are delayed. Unlike centralized systems where transaction processing is almost instantaneous, blockchains rely on block production cycles and validator availability. On chains with slower block times or limited capacity, confirmation delays become more frequent, sometimes stretching to several minutes or even hours. These delays create uncertainty, disrupt user experience, and increase the likelihood of transaction failure or staleness.

Together, these three scalability issues form a self-reinforcing cycle: congestion leads to rising fees and slower confirmations, which in turn discourages the use of blockchain applications and weakens trust in them. For developers, these limitations restrict the types of decentralized applications (DApps) that can be built and scaled. For users, they create a slow, expensive, and unpredictable environment. If left unaddressed, these constraints will continue to prevent blockchain from competing with the fast and powerful infrastructure of Web 2.0.

Public Blockchain Scalability Solutions

Various blockchain scalability solutions have been proposed and implemented to achieve faster, cheaper transactions, quicker finality, and higher throughput. These solutions typically focus on making architectural modifications to the base Layer 1 chain or maintaining the integrity of Layer 1 while extending network capabilities through Layer 2 technologies.

Layer 1 Solutions

Layer 1 solutions are protocol-level changes that directly modify blockchain architecture to improve throughput and performance. These changes affect how transactions are processed, validated, and stored across the entire network.

Consensus Mechanism Improvements

The consensus mechanism determines how nodes in a blockchain agree on the validity of transactions and the state of the ledger. The world's oldest viable chain, the Bitcoin blockchain, uses the Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism, which provides robust security but offers low throughput and high energy consumption. As the initial consensus model implemented in the industry, PoW remains popular and is used by networks besides Bitcoin, such as Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Dogecoin (DOGE), and Litecoin (LTC).

A key way to achieve higher scalability at Layer 1 is by transitioning from PoW to newer, more scalable consensus algorithms. The most common of these is likely Proof of Stake (PoS), now used by Ethereum (ETH) and many other smart contract-capable networks. PoS allows validators to process and attest to blocks of transactions based on the amount of tokens they have locked up in the network and their stake, reducing the computational burden. In contrast, PoW requires block validators (often called miners on PoW-based chains) to solve complex, energy-intensive mathematical puzzles to add new blocks to the network's ledger. The transition from PoW to PoS improves the efficiency of new blockchains, reduces energy usage, and increases overall scalability.

Other performance-focused consensus mechanisms, such as Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS)used in networks like TRON (TRX) and Proof of History (PoH) used by Solana (SOL), further optimize block production and scalability. These alternatives prioritize higher transaction capacity, making them highly attractive for application areas requiring real-time or near-real-time performance.

Sharding

Sharding is a method of partitioning a blockchain network into smaller, manageable pieces called shards. Each shard processes its own set of transactions and maintains a subset of the total data, reducing the load on any single node and increasing the overall network throughput.

Instead of requiring all nodes to validate every transaction, sharding enables parallel processing across multiple components. This significantly increases the number of transactions that can be processed simultaneously. Ethereum's long-term scalability roadmap includes a full sharding implementation, which is expected to boost its transaction capacity while preserving decentralization and security.

Although sharding is a promising solution, it presents challenges such as cross-shard communication and data consistency. Nevertheless, it remains one of the most effective Layer 1 solutions for scaling a blockchain while keeping validation security distributed.

Segregated Witness (SegWit)

Segregated Witness, or SegWit, was introduced to address block size limits in Bitcoin by separating key metadata, the signature data from the core transaction data. By moving signatures out of the main transaction block, more space is created for additional transactions, effectively increasing throughput.

SegWit reduces transaction size and helps prevent certain types of transaction malleability. After the upgrade, the number of transactions per block increases, improving block propagation efficiency across the network.

Initially proposed for the Bitcoin network, SegWit was first activated on Litecoin in May 2017, with Bitcoin following a few months later. While not a primary game-changer for blockchain scalability, SegWit has improved performance on chains where its activation has been relatively slow.

Layer 2 Solutions

Layer 2 solutions operate on top of an existing blockchain, handling most transactions off the main Layer 1 network while settling final results periodically. This approach preserves the security and decentralization of the underlying network while dramatically increasing transaction speed and reducing congestion. The most common Layer 2 scalability solutions include sidechains and rollups.

Sidechains

A sidechain is an independent blockchain that runs parallel to the main Layer 1 chain, connecting to it via a two-way bridge or peg. Assets can be moved between the main blockchain network and the sidechain, allowing transactions and smart contracts to be executed on the latter.

Sidechains enable experimentation with different consensus models, block sizes, or application-specific logic without affecting the stability of the main chain. They can process transactions more quickly and at lower cost, later submitting the final results to the main blockchain.

One limitation of sidechains is that they do not inherit the full security guarantees of the main chain. Their security depends on the sidechain's own validator set or consensus model, introducing a separate layer of trust.

Rollups

Rollups bundle or "roll up" multiple transactions into a single batch, which is then posted to the main blockchain. Computation and storage are handled off-chain, while only summary data and proofs are recorded on-chain. This significantly reduces the load on the base layer while leveraging the security of the main network.

Rollups are primarily divided into two categories: Optimistic Rollups and Zero-Knowledge (ZK) Rollups. Optimistic rollups assume that transactions posted to the underlying blockchain are valid by default and rely on fraud proofs provided by Layer 1 validators to detect any invalid activity. ZK rollups use cryptographic proofs to verify the validity of all transactions in a batch, resulting in faster transaction settlement than optimistic rollups but with greater technical complexity.

Rollups have already been deployed on Ethereum with significant effect, enabling users to transact faster and more cheaply while alleviating congestion on the underlying network. They represent one of the most promising directions for scaling without sacrificing decentralization and security.

Emerging Scalability Approaches

Interoperability Protocols

Interoperability protocols enable multiple blockchains to communicate and share data efficiently, offering another path to scalability. Instead of scaling a single chain, these systems create networks of specialized chains that can offload work to each other while maintaining coordination. For example, the Polkadot (DOT) ecosystem uses a central relay chain to connect independent networks called parachains, allowing them to process transactions in parallel while benefiting from shared security.

Cosmos (ATOM) follows a similar model via the Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) protocol, connecting separate blockchains within its ecosystem, but, like Polkadot, without a centralized main chain. These networks expand the total transaction capacity of the entire ecosystem rather than that of a single chain, providing a flexible approach to scalability. Interoperability protocols also lay the groundwork for application-specific chains optimized for particular use cases.

Modular Blockchains

Modular blockchains address scalability by decomposing the monolithic structure of a traditional blockchain into separate, dedicated layers. Instead of a single chain handling execution, consensus, and data availability, a modular architecture assigns these tasks to distinct components. For instance, Celestia (TIA) focuses primarily on data availability, allowing other networks to handle execution and settlement independently. This separation enables better scaling by optimizing each layer for its specific function.

Conclusion

Scalability remains one of the most persistent challenges in blockchain development. While early networks like Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Ethereum laid the foundation for decentralized systems, their limited capacity has driven continuous efforts to improve throughput, reduce fees, and enable mass adoption. From Layer 1 upgrades and Layer 2 scaling frameworks to modular designs and interoperable networks, solutions have been widely implemented at both the protocol and infrastructure levels.

Each method involves trade-offs, but together they are pushing the industry toward more efficient and scalable architectures. As the blockchain community continues to test, refine, and apply these approaches, the gap between decentralized and traditional Web 2.0 systems will narrow further. One day, blockchain may become the infrastructure of choice for applications with high scalability demands, from enterprise solutions and finance to gaming, social networking, and beyond.

CoinCatch Team

Join us on Telegram

Disclaimer:

Digital asset prices carry high market risk and price volatility. You should carefully consider your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance. CoinCatch is not responsible for any losses that may occur. This article should not be considered financial advice.

December 2025 FOMC Meeting: Rate Cuts, a $45B Bond Plan, and Crypto Implications A Comprehensive Guide to Web3 Architecture